As for forum, thinking that they aren't worth mentionning is just. Amazon is here just to mention the fact, and account for a non negligible part of games sales. I would say that metacritic is one, as it aggregates critics from various reliable information sources, such as gaming websites and magazines.
Neon White thinks that Metacritic, Forums and amazon aren't a reliable source. I'm personnaly a fan of the serie, and have already bought the game, so I don't think that I should be accused of beeing partial/boycott prone.
It would be another kind of unobjectivity to just delete this paragraph, as it is FACTUAL that the game obtain really bad reviews on commercial websites from angry customers. If you think that parts of my edit are biased, despite my will to make it objective, then fine, just modify them.īut I really think that there are too many negative reviews on amazon&co, contrasting with the general excellent critics this game obtained, to simply delete this point. I thought it would be fair to mention them, as it is fair to say that this game is otherwise acclaimed by majors game reviewers. I haven't invented the reviews on, , .uk and, neither have I written all posts on various forums about this problem. Would ensure that this writing was as objective as possible. citing as many sources as possible for those problemsthis linking to reviews from amazon stating large concerns about drm mentionning the excellent critics the game has obtained I posted this thing trying to be as objective as possible. Jack Masamune ( talk) 11:11, 4 July 2009 (UTC) They are not just two incarnations of the same thing. Gameplay, option and storyline is drastically different between the two.
0 kommentar(er)
